Fiat Croma 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma and Seat Toledo have the same engine power, but Fiat Croma torque is 4 NM less than Seat Toledo. Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.1 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 20 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |