Fiat Croma 1993 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |