Fiat Croma 2005 vs Audi A4 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi A4 2001: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control that operates at speeds up to 40 km/h and applies brakes to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Croma engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 159, Alfa Romeo Brera, Alfa Romeo Spider | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A8 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Croma might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 21 cm longer than the Audi A4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 58 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi A4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Audi A4 has
| |