Fiat Croma 2005 vs Mazda 6 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2002 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 492 litres | |
| Fiat Croma has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |