Fiat Croma 2005 vs Mazda 6 2005

 
Fiat Croma
2005 - 2007
Mazda 6
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 147 HP147 HP
Torque: 203 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Fiat Croma and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Fiat Croma torque is 19 NM more than Mazda 6. Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.78.0
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway1010 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2005 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.69 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.60 m1.44 m
Fiat Croma is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres492 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1662 litres
Fiat Croma has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`885
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 26001600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Croma has
  • higher safety
Mazda 6 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv