Fiat Croma 2005 vs Honda Accord 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 13 NM more than Honda Accord. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
| By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Accord 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1657 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Fiat Croma uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 2`030 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`465 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 565 kg | |
| Fiat Croma load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Honda Accord. Therefore, Honda Accord is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Honda Accord has
| |