Fiat Croma 2005 vs Mazda 6 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 121 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 1 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Croma consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 492 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1662 litres | |
| Fiat Croma has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |