Fiat Croma 2005 vs Ford Mondeo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.43 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |