Fiat Croma 2008 vs Mazda 6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 174 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |