Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma and Skoda Superb have the same engine power, but Fiat Croma torque is 120 NM more than Skoda Superb. Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 633 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 133 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |