Fiat Croma 2008 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 80 HP more power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 145 NM more than Fiat Bravo. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.3 | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 44 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 100 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |