Fiat Croma 2008 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Fiat Croma
2008 - 2011
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 147 HP147 HP
Torque: 204 NM184 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds10.2 seconds
Fiat Croma and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Fiat Croma torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 6. Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.37.1
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 330 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway1160 km on highway
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda 6 2008 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.76 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.60 m1.44 m
Fiat Croma and Mazda 6 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1702 litres
Fiat Croma has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0501`950
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24003000
Pros and Cons: Fiat Croma has
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv