Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 53 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 76 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.0 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 8 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 633 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 133 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |