Fiat Croma 2008 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 27 HP more power than Fiat Bravo, but torque is 51 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Despite the higher power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 5.3 | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 42 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 100 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |