Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 10 HP more power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 103 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`132 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |