Fiat Croma 2008 vs Mazda 6 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`040 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |