Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 103 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 2`132 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |