Fiat Croma 2008 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma and Fiat Bravo have the same engine power, but Fiat Croma torque is 25 NM more than Fiat Bravo. Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Croma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.50 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 44 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 100 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |