Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Croma consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 103 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`096 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |