Fiat Croma 1986 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 1.3 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 155 HP | 54 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 100 - 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 16.5 seconds | 9.5 - 25.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.3 | 6.0 - 10.3 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 5 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`245 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |