Fiat Croma 1986 vs Ford Sierra 1987
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Fiat Croma is available only with front wheel drive, while Ford Sierra can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 155 HP | 67 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 119 - 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 16.5 seconds | 8.8 - 19.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.3 | 6.7 - 11.6 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 8 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`245 | ~ 1`243 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |