Fiat Croma 1991 vs Seat Toledo 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 162 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 124 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | 9.4 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.0 | 5.7 - 9.1 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 20 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`320 | ~ 1`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Toledo has
| |