Fiat Croma 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Fiat Croma is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.9 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 92 - 162 HP | 92 - 194 HP | |
Torque: | 162 - 247 NM | 171 - 275 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.5 seconds | 8.8 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.0 | 7.1 - 11.2 | |
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.67 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
Fiat Croma is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`320 | ~ 1`753 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |