Fiat Croma 2005 vs Honda Accord 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 140 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11.3 seconds | 8.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.7 | 5.8 - 10.0 | |
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.47 m | |
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 1 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 576 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1657 litres | |
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Fiat Croma has 76 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. This could mean that the Fiat Croma uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`993 | ~ 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Honda Accord has
| |