Fiat Croma 2008 vs Opel Astra 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 95 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 130 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.3 | 4.2 - 7.5 | |
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
Fiat Croma is 36 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
Fiat Croma has more luggage capacity. Fiat Croma has 130 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`053 | ~ 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Opel Astra has
| |