Fiat Croma 2008 vs Mazda 6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11 seconds | 8.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.3 | 5.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Fiat Croma petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.44 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`053 kg | ~ 2`016 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |