Fiat Croma 2008 vs Skoda Superb 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Fiat Croma is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 125 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 400 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 11 seconds | 6.6 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.3 | 5.9 - 10.2 | |
|
On average, the Fiat Croma petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Skoda Superb. On average, Fiat Croma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but higher. Fiat Croma is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 633 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Fiat Croma has 133 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`053 | ~ 2`143 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |