Fiat Cinquecento 1991 vs Ford KA 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.7 - 1.1 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 31 - 54 HP | 50 - 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 47 - 86 NM | 97 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 - 30 seconds | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 6.2 | 5.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Fiat Cinquecento petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.23 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.49 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Fiat Cinquecento is smaller, but higher. Fiat Cinquecento is 39 cm shorter than the Ford KA, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Cinquecento is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | 724 litres | |
| Fiat Cinquecento has 16 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Cinquecento (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Cinquecento is 1 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Fiat Cinquecento can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`120 | ~ 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Cinquecento has
|
Ford KA has
| |