Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Renault Megane 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 30 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 4 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 28 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`762 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |