Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Fiat Bravo engine produces 30 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger, but lower. Fiat Bravo is 5 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 538 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Fiat Bravo has 138 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. This could mean that the Fiat Bravo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |