Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Peugeot 308 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 30 HP more power than Peugeot 308, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 308. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Bravo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 308 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 308 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 308, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 348 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1201 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 52 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 308. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 308, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 308 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Peugeot 308, so Peugeot 308 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Peugeot 308 has
| |