Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Nissan Tiida 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Fiat Bravo engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Tiida, but torque is 82 NM more than Nissan Tiida. Due to the lower power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Bravo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Bravo is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 272 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 128 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |