Fiat Bravo 2007 vs Chevrolet Lacetti 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Fiat Bravo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Lacetti) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 11 HP more power than Chevrolet Lacetti, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Chevrolet Lacetti. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Lacetti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Nubira | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Lacetti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Lacetti engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Lacetti 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Lacetti, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 125 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Lacetti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Chevrolet Lacetti has
| |