Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Hyundai i30 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 50 HP more power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Hyundai i30. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Bravo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Bravo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 6 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |