Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Bravo engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo V40, but torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Bravo is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Bravo has 76 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |