Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Opel Astra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 5 HP less power than Opel Astra, but torque is 30 NM more than Opel Astra. Despite less power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1560 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Combo | Used also on Opel Zafira | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Bravo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Fiat Bravo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 8 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Bravo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The Opel Astra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Opel Astra has
| |