Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 10 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 35 NM more than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1560 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1070 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Bravo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Combo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia Venga | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger. Fiat Bravo is 10 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1300 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |