Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Renault Megane 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Fiat Bravo and Renault Megane have the same engine power, but Fiat Bravo torque is 90 NM more than Renault Megane. Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.5 | |
| Fiat Bravo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 1560 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 4 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 372 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 28 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`762 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |