Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Bravo engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Bravo is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 324 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1175 litres | 1500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 325 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`785 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |