Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Opel Astra 2010

 
Fiat Bravo
2010 -
Opel Astra
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 120 HP140 HP
Torque: 206 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds9.8 seconds
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive.
Fiat Bravo engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Astra, but torque is 6 NM more than Opel Astra. Despite less power, Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.17.0
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Bravo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1010 km on highway
Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 13 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiToInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia, Opel Mokka
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Astra might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.42 m
Width: 1.79 m1.81 m
Height: 1.50 m1.51 m
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 8 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1235 litres
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Bravo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The Opel Astra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7851`870
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 46003600
Pros and Cons: Fiat Bravo has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Astra has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv