Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Nissan Tiida 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Tiida, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Nissan Tiida. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida, which means that by driving the Fiat Bravo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Tiida might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Fiat Bravo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Fiat Bravo is larger, but slightly lower. Fiat Bravo is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Tiida, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 272 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 467 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 128 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Tiida. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Nissan Tiida has
| |