Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Citroen C4 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Bravo engine produces 25 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 71 NM more than Citroen C4. Thanks to more power Fiat Bravo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Bravo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Bravo could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Bravo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 208, Citroen C3 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Bravo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
| Fiat Bravo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |