Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat Bravo
2010 - 2014
Volvo V40
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 165 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 128 - 360 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 - 13.1 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
In general, Volvo V40 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Fiat Bravo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 6.63.4 - 5.9
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.37 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Fiat Bravo is smaller, but higher.
Fiat Bravo is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 400 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1175 litres1500 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 325 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volvo V40, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`801 kg~ 1`978 kg
Net weight:~ 1`288 kg~ 1`499 kg
Load capacity:~ 513 kg~ 479 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 540011 200
Pros and Cons: Fiat Bravo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv