Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Renault Megane 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 165 HP | 106 - 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 360 NM | 151 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 10.1 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.6 | 4.2 - 7.8 | |
|
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 4 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1162 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 3595 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Renault Megane has
| |