Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Opel Astra 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 165 HP | 95 - 180 HP | |
Torque: | 128 - 360 NM | 130 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.6 | 4.2 - 7.5 | |
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Astra. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo is 8 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Bravo is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Fiat Bravo has 3630 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The Opel Astra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`945 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Opel Astra has
| |