Fiat Bravo 2010 vs Citroen C4 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 165 HP | 92 - 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 360 NM | 135 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | 8.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.6 | 3.7 - 6.9 | |
|
Fiat Bravo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4. On average, Fiat Bravo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Bravo and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 4000 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Bravo has 3620 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Bravo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Fiat Bravo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`801 | ~ 1`806 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Bravo has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |