Fiat Brava 1995 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 119 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Brava engine produces 50 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 146 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma. Due to the lower power, Fiat Brava reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Brava consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Brava could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Fiat Brava is 29 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Brava is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1165 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Fiat Brava has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Brava (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |