Fiat Brava 1998 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Fiat Brava engine produces 15 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Brava reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Brava consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Brava could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Brava consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Fiat Brava is smaller. Fiat Brava is 15 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Brava is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
775 litres | 1175 litres | |
| Fiat Brava has 20 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Bravo (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 565 kg | 510 kg | |
| Fiat Brava load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Fiat Bravo. Therefore, Fiat Brava is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 405 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |