Fiat Brava 1998 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Brava engine produces 47 HP less power than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Brava reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.5 | |
|
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Brava consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Brava could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Fiat Brava is smaller. Fiat Brava is 15 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Brava is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
775 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 405 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |