Fiat Brava 1998 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 113 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Brava engine produces 8 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Brava reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Brava is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Brava consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Brava could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Brava consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Fiat Brava is smaller. Fiat Brava is 15 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Brava is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 380 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
775 litres | 1175 litres | |
| Fiat Brava has 20 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Bravo (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`570 kg | 1`715 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`015 kg | 1`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 510 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Fiat Bravo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 405 percent more cases than Fiat Bravo, so Fiat Bravo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Brava has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |